The week 2 assignment is a little confusing. You are to write an informal presentation and present to some other nurses. After that, write the second paper and summarize their feedback. You can tie them together in one document, or submit them separately, whichever you want to do. I just need to see that they are separate, not just one big paper. I’ll attach an example of tieing the 2 together in one document. If you have questions, please let me know.
As the country focuses on the restructuring of the U.S. health care delivery system, nurses will continue to play an important role. It is expected that more and more nursing jobs will become available out in the community, and fewer will be available in acute care hospitals.
- Write an informal presentation (500-700 words) to educate nurses about how the practice of nursing is expected to grow and change. Include the concepts of continuity or continuum of care, accountable care organizations (ACO), medical homes, and nurse-managed health clinics.
- Share your presentation with nurse colleagues on your unit or department and ask them to offer their impressions of the anticipated changes to health care delivery and the new role of nurses in hospital settings, communities, clinics, and medical homes.
- In 800-1,000 words summarize the feedback shared by three nurse colleagues and discuss whether their impressions are consistent with what you have researched about health reform.
- A minimum of three scholarly references are required for this assignment.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Evolving Practice of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery Models
|
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less than Satisfactory 75.00% |
3
Satisfactory 79.00% |
4
Good 89.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.0 %Content
|
||||||
|
40.0 % Clearly States How the Practice of Nursing and Patient Delivery Will Evolve, While Addressing Relevant Concepts That Include Continuity or Continuum of Care, Accountable Care Organizations, Medical Homes, and Nurse-Managed Health Clinics
|
Main concept is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea. Does not address any issues related to the evolving practice of nursing and patient care delivery.
|
Main concept is not clearly identified, and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Addresses at least one issue related to the evolving practice of nursing and patient care delivery.
|
Main concept is identified, and a few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Addresses many of the issues related to the evolving practice of nursing and patient delivery and patient care delivery.
|
Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. Addresses all of the issues related to the evolving practice of nursing and patient care delivery.
|
Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Addresses all of the issues related to the evolving practice of nursing and patient care delivery.
|
|
|
20.0 % Evidence of Feedback and Forecasting of Nursing Role From Colleagues
|
No evidence of feedback and forecasting of the nursing role from colleagues is included.
|
Evidence of feedback and forecasting of the nursing role from colleagues may be incomplete or lack relevant scope.
|
Evidence of feedback and forecasting of the nursing role from colleagues is included.
|
Evidence of feedback and forecasting of the nursing role from colleagues is described in detail.
|
Evidence of feedback and forecasting of the nursing role from colleagues is described in detail, with relevant personal insight, reflection, or analysis.
|
|
|
20.0 % Use of Vocabulary Regarding Evolving Practice of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery
|
No recommended terms have been included in the correct context.
|
Few recommended terms have been included in the correct context.
|
Some recommended terms have been included in the correct context.
|
Most recommended terms have been included in the correct context.
|
All of the recommended terms have been included in the correct context.
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
||||||
|
10.0 % Originality
|
Content is an extensive collection and rehash of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.
|
Content is a minimal collection or rehash of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought.
|
Content shows evidence of originality. While based on other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights.
|
Content shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an extensive collection of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights.
|
Content shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
||||||
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
|
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
|
|
|
5.0 %Format
|
||||||
|
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
3.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
|
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error
|
|
